WHY SOME COUNTRIES DO NOT HAVE PUBLIC EDUCATION
What are the advantages of public education? Obviously, it will help if all children receive an education that is free and accessible. But that is not always the case. Some countries lack public education because they choose not to implement it. The government is often more concerned with promoting economic webshots development than with providing an excellent education for all children. Fortunately, there are ways to help improve public education in a country without an established government program.
Poor children are among the worst 3net affected. Disease, chronic malnutrition, and chaotic environments all undermine their early development. And even within countries, poverty is an impediment. On average, low-income students perform worse in school than their peers in richer OECD nations. In South Africa, third graders are three years behind the children of wealthier families. Lack of resources and shortage of high-quality teachers have further hindered quality education in such countries.
While public schools have not been a lockerz universal phenomenon since the 19th century, the idea of public education has been implemented on several occasions throughout history. In ancient Jerusalem, for example, the Kohen Gadol demanded that all children over five years of age be educated. In other countries, it was only in the nineteenth century that public education took hold on a large scale. And now, nearly bayimg every country in the world offers public education.
While there are many benefits of public education, not all countries have it. Poor countries often struggle to provide an adequate education for their citizens. For example, the Dutch government funds seventy-five percent of their schools while the governments in France and Belgium provide only streamzoo thirty-one percent. In comparison, the UK and Finland provide less than half of their public education. But in both countries, children who receive quality education are better than their peers in other countries.
However, there is a counterargument to the concept of universal public education. While a universal public school system would help eliminate segregation in society, it is unlikely to eliminate it completely. Even ostensibly integrated schools have segregated students. In fact, whites tend to dominate the honors classes. In an all-public world, schools would be funded by a mix of federal, state, and local funds. This moviesverse would mean that the quality of education would vary according to the neighborhood in which a child lived.
One way to assess the success of public education is by looking at the structure of school governance. The study compares five institutional features of a nation’s educational system, including whether it relies on centralized exams, the level of teacher influence, and competition from private schools. The study also looks at the distribution of power between schools and governing bodies. The more school autonomy schools have, the better. For example, in the Netherlands, 73 percent of school decisions are made at the local level.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete